In the hottest round of AV-TEST Institute tests, Bitdefender and Kaspersky received optimum scores with respect to malware detection rates. Additionally, they earned best product accreditation and obtained well in conditions of prevention of zero-day dangers. However , Kaspersky had significantly less of a problem with false positives than Bitdefender. This is very likely due to the fact that Kaspersky’s detection engine is more finely fine-tined and provides a better feeling of precisely what is actually dangerous, versus what might appear benign but actually isn’t.
Both applications have an easy user interface and gives some interesting functions. Bitdefender offers a Saving Environment, for instance , which can scan the body files even if the operating-system isn’t jogging. It also contains a home display with different utilities in two prominent rows and allows you to further personalize the layout. Kaspersky, on the other hand, contains a white user interface that uses too much space and can be perplexing to steer.
Bitdefender’s customer support is available through email and online chat, while Kaspersky offers phone and distant assistance too. The two programs include extensive knowledge bases with articles basic standards of the data room software and videos covering an array of topics, which include how to use goods.
Both courses have good performance, with Bitdefender using significantly less methods than Kaspersky in our tests. In a check with Surpass, for example , Bitdefender demanded 66% of the CPU capacity when no reads were active, although Kaspersky utilized only 38%. The latter was also a bit more efficient when it came to memory demand, using only 16% of the sixteen GB offered, compared to 21% for the competitor.